The Wicker Man - remix
Sep. 5th, 2006 03:31 pmI went to go see the new Wicker Man movie last night. It's a remake of a 70s cult classic. Classically bad, but fantastic in it's attempt to create a pagan thriller. With a higher budget and some research it could have been really good! This new version involves even less research and Nicholas Cage. And wow, is it a misogynist piece of crap! I wasn't expecting much of it anyway. Basically, paganism was reduced to a goddess worshiping matriarchy in which men are mute powerless eunuchs and the daughters are trained to use their sexual wiles to lure unsuspecting nice guys to their sacrificial doom. Oh, and patriarchy is essentially portrayed (not explicitly, of course) as the entitled voice of reason and the defender of monogamist true love. (Not to mention Nick Cage's ham-fisted acting.)
The film was painful and it brings up an idea that I've had bouncing around in my head, although surely it has been better articulated elsewhere, that there is a gender backlash occurring. Advertising and film and tv have men being more macho, more Lad-like, more "I eat meat, therefore I am manly." Whereas women are equating feminism with pornified visions of femininity - because I can be sexy! It's a feminist perogative to be my most empowered self! Which really just means finally looking like the slut that mainstream media has been force-feeding women for a good 20 years. Yeah, I'm being harsh, but I hate seeing goddess worship equated with matriarchy. I hate seeing matriarchy equated with man-hating. I hate seeing paganism depicted as an enemy of all that is rational. I hate seeing a rude entitled man portrayed as the defender of true love. I hate seeing strong women depicted as the downfall of strong men.
God! Why does everything in America have to be in either/or terms?!
The film was painful and it brings up an idea that I've had bouncing around in my head, although surely it has been better articulated elsewhere, that there is a gender backlash occurring. Advertising and film and tv have men being more macho, more Lad-like, more "I eat meat, therefore I am manly." Whereas women are equating feminism with pornified visions of femininity - because I can be sexy! It's a feminist perogative to be my most empowered self! Which really just means finally looking like the slut that mainstream media has been force-feeding women for a good 20 years. Yeah, I'm being harsh, but I hate seeing goddess worship equated with matriarchy. I hate seeing matriarchy equated with man-hating. I hate seeing paganism depicted as an enemy of all that is rational. I hate seeing a rude entitled man portrayed as the defender of true love. I hate seeing strong women depicted as the downfall of strong men.
God! Why does everything in America have to be in either/or terms?!
Re: Wicker Maaan ...
Date: 2006-09-07 04:46 pm (UTC)As to why men are so terrified of women, I don't get it. I really don't. I can argue why as a group men might feel their power threatened and the uncertainty scares them...... But many men are powerless, too. I just don't understand the man vs woman fear. Can you help explain it to me?
Re: Wicker Maaan ...
Date: 2006-09-08 01:55 am (UTC)Gonads is an arbitrary way to allot power. Sometimes it's the only reason a guy has any, because inside he's a mess. If he comes across a woman who overmatches him from the inside out, he's going to feel it. He'll scramble for something to hold onto, to hold over her.
These days I think it's not just one guy meeting one woman. It's an area effect. People generalize.