take another look at the comment i made. the one you copied & pasted. #2 refers to, ummm, #2 in the OP's post. it was an exaggerated way of saying "i'm not going into detail for this observation." did i mention that it's, ummm, isolated to #2? please do not tell me what i did and did not say. thanks.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2009-04-10 04:24 pm (UTC)