We watched Avatar last night
Feb. 22nd, 2010 05:50 pmIt was annoying and fabulous, but mostly it was GORGEOUS. As Adam said half way through the film, "I can't believe we only get to spend 2.5 hours here." It was also very typical James Cameron - simplistic, stock characters, visually impressive, and also emotionally engrossing. Anyone remember Titanic? It came out when I was in college and I saw it three times in the theatre. I was engrossed, despite its cheese, and I sobbed my eyes out at the end every time. Sheesh.
I was really put off in the beginning with the heavy-handedness of the science v business v military stuff. I dislike the shallow caricatures: muscly bone headed war mongering military dudes (Michelle Rodriguez saved the day), profit at all costs business man, and 'everything for my data/subjects' scientist. And..... then there's the Jesus/white guy/saviour. And the Na'vi - peaceful, nature loving, simple tribal folk.
Anyone else notice a Jesus motif? He comes from the Sky People. He's two essences in one body. He's saves them. He was (briefly) hung on a 'cross.' The tree spores descend on him (like the dove of the Holy Spirit at Jesus' baptism) as a sign of his choseness. In a witty flip, though, Eywa reminds me of an anagram of Yahweh.
And I have to say, I loathe the papyrus font, which is what the subtitles were in. It's a font that people seem to think says "I'm spiritual!" But really, it's just overused and way passe.
But in spite of all that I was engrossed. I cheered for the Na'vi and wanted the love story to work out. I loved the beauty of the world that was created, from the graphics, to the animal and plant design, to the spiritual poignancy of being able to 'plug in' to the Tree of Souls. The most moving part for me was when the main female character (whose name I never caught) goes after Jake's human body, cradles his (in comparison) tiny and frail body, and seeing him for the first time, says "My Jake." Choked me right up, that did.
I will so watch this again. Bennett loved it too. It was a more than a bit violent in parts (oops) but the plants and animals and Na'vi people entranced him.
I was really put off in the beginning with the heavy-handedness of the science v business v military stuff. I dislike the shallow caricatures: muscly bone headed war mongering military dudes (Michelle Rodriguez saved the day), profit at all costs business man, and 'everything for my data/subjects' scientist. And..... then there's the Jesus/white guy/saviour. And the Na'vi - peaceful, nature loving, simple tribal folk.
Anyone else notice a Jesus motif? He comes from the Sky People. He's two essences in one body. He's saves them. He was (briefly) hung on a 'cross.' The tree spores descend on him (like the dove of the Holy Spirit at Jesus' baptism) as a sign of his choseness. In a witty flip, though, Eywa reminds me of an anagram of Yahweh.
And I have to say, I loathe the papyrus font, which is what the subtitles were in. It's a font that people seem to think says "I'm spiritual!" But really, it's just overused and way passe.
But in spite of all that I was engrossed. I cheered for the Na'vi and wanted the love story to work out. I loved the beauty of the world that was created, from the graphics, to the animal and plant design, to the spiritual poignancy of being able to 'plug in' to the Tree of Souls. The most moving part for me was when the main female character (whose name I never caught) goes after Jake's human body, cradles his (in comparison) tiny and frail body, and seeing him for the first time, says "My Jake." Choked me right up, that did.
I will so watch this again. Bennett loved it too. It was a more than a bit violent in parts (oops) but the plants and animals and Na'vi people entranced him.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-22 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 08:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 05:28 pm (UTC)Though I have some trouble with the "white saviour saves helpless 'blue' people"-subject which I see - yes -, but I think it's important to keep in mind, that his whole ability to do anything depends on his Knowledge of and Connection with the Na'vi and their ways. He doesn't preach to them and would never have been able to save the day without becoming one of them "in the flesh" and spirit.
I LOVE the movie! There is so much more that I love about it than what I could and do criticize. It makes me cry every single time I see it ... .
bb*
Gwydion
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-22 07:42 pm (UTC)But I think the most interesting part for me was that at no point did I feel like I was watching animation, and that's pretty cool.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 08:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-22 10:24 pm (UTC)Neytiri. :-)
If you ever get a chance to watch this in 3D, don't pass it up. I had trouble with the race stuff in the movie, but it is gorgeous.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 08:49 am (UTC)Worst use of Papyrus ever.
Date: 2010-02-22 11:28 pm (UTC)Re: Worst use of Papyrus ever.
Date: 2010-02-23 08:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 04:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 08:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 09:47 am (UTC)In no way did I choose Papyrus because I thought it would make me appear 'spiritual.' I AM spiritual. I chose the font because I like it & for no other reason.
With respect, graphic designers aren't the only arbiters of what constitutes good taste & the assumption that a writer (anyone) is 'trying to convey something' through the medium of a font, is just that ~ an assumption.
I was trying to convey something with the narrative of my story. But that is something else entirely.
(And to the suggestion of defensiveness ~ I'm a Witch remember; I know about these things ~ so what?)
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 01:34 pm (UTC)I'm getting confused, however. If a font is useful and conveys a meaning either consciously or unconsciously why is it passe?
But, of course, the original poster, whose site this is, has every right to loath it. That is a personal and perhaps unconscious response.
In any case, this has been an interesting detour on the discussion of the film.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 03:41 pm (UTC)Passe means 'outmoded.' I think its stretching it a bit to name a font as being old fashioned. The Papyrus font I would suggest is in fact very popular now ~ almost ubiquitous. And of course, we are all entitled to our opinion. I hope I have been respectful in my comments.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 03:44 pm (UTC)I was hesitant to mention the papyrus dis knowing that you'd chosen it for your book. But it doesn't mean I have to like it. Your choosing that font fits in with the aesthetic of people I would think would like it. Just like I look like, and am, the sort of pretentious twat who loves Literary Fiction that she'll never read and Mac products.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 01:24 pm (UTC)If, indeed, papyrus has "spiritual and beauty" connotations and these were the ideas the director wanted to evoke in his viewers then he chose wisely.
I like the font. It is readable which is the first consideration. It has a certain elegance and fluidity. It is a "feminine" font. It is not one I can use often. Usually I am looking for fonts with a stronger "masculine" aura. I need fonts that are bold, vivid and above all readable.
no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-23 09:48 am (UTC)Quite
no subject
Date: 2010-02-24 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-02-24 10:21 pm (UTC)There is a font, I don't know the name of it, but Ethiopian restaurants use it. It drives me nuts.